radegund: (swans)
[personal profile] radegund
[Cross-posted to [livejournal.com profile] radegund and [livejournal.com profile] plan_survive]

I was very upset by something I read this evening.

It was Oisín's bedtime, and he asked for a bedtime story from one of the Thomas the Tank Engine annuals (which K buys for him online). We picked one at random and turned pages until a story called "James Gets Cracking" received the nod of approval.

    It was a bright, spring morning when James puffed importantly into the yard. The Fat Controller had an unusual job for him today.
    "Well done James," he said, "I see you have plenty of steam already."
    "Yes Sir," replied James eagerly.
    "That means you can set off right away," said the Fat Controller.
    "Where to Sir?" asked James.
    "To the battery farm," said the Fat Controller.


At this point I stopped reading, skimmed disbelievingly ahead, confirmed that this really was a story for small children that unironically featured an actual battery farm, and burst into tears. I explained to Oisín that I couldn't read the story because it upset me; he asked me to read it anyway, but I said I wouldn't. We found another story instead (about how silly Mavis thought she could do her job without Toby's help), and peace was restored. Then we went up to bed, where I was still so rattled that I shouted at Oisín when he didn't move fast enough for me, and he had a meltdown. Eventually everyone calmed down, and he was asleep by 9:00.

The punchline of "James Gets Cracking", you'll be intrigued to hear, has nothing to do with debeaking, or permanent tracheal damage from the ammonia given off by large volumes of excrement, or dead birds left decaying in cages. It doesn't even involve James and the Fat Controller performing a heroic rescue of the beleaguered hens from their vile oppressor, Farmer Finney. No, it's about James thinking that the crates he's carrying are full of batteries, when in fact they're full of eggs, which he's delivering to a school so the children can make pancakes for Shrove Tuesday.

(The publication date of the annual, incidentally, is 1995.)

I've tolerated the strike-breaking episode ("Trouble in the Shed"), and I've tolerated the rampant sexism (e.g. anything to do with Mavis), but I do not want to have to explain battery farms to my three-year-old son. And I do not want to read to him about them as though they were unremarkable, either. I'm generally upset and enraged by bad art directed at children, but this evening's encounter is in another league altogether.

I cannot deintroduce Thomas, much though I might like to. This particular annual, however, will be disappearing.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-10-10 08:54 am (UTC)
ext_37604: (Default)
From: [identity profile] glitzfrau.livejournal.com
Oooh, and Shrove Tuesday, too. Let's get in a bit of christian propaganda, as well.

That is just vile. At least the 1950s books have post-war colonial ignorance to excuse their strikebreaking sexist ways. The modern commercialised spin-offs are pure sinister, rather than bumbling-vicar pathetic. Ugh.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-10-10 09:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] natural20.livejournal.com
Does the mention of a school in a country that is mainly, on paper at least, of something like Shrove Tuesday really count as Christian propaganda? I mean, most of the people reading those annuals in the UK (which was the majority target audience) probably don't even recognise it as a religious festival any more. Now, I've no idea if the story eulogised on how wonderful it was that the children would be preparing themselves for forty days of fast and abstinence etc., but I rather doubt it.

It sounds like there was a lot wrong with the story (and Thomas stories in general, I haven't read/seen any of them in many years), but from that one reference I would see the Shrove Tuesday bit as a convenient plot point rather than propaganda.

Of course, your mileage may vary.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-10-10 09:59 am (UTC)
ext_37604: (Default)
From: [identity profile] glitzfrau.livejournal.com
Oh, I know. And after all, the author was a vicar. But for me, it all feeds into the twee middle-Englishness that saturates Thomas and refuses to acknowledge either any of the social changes that have happened here since the 1950s, or even acknowledge any point of view other than that of the Fat Controller at the time. It's a horrendously homogenous world. Then again, I am bitter because of years of my father force-feeding my Thomas despite much five-year-old eye rolling.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-10-10 10:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] natural20.livejournal.com
(Side note, I really need to reread my comments before hitting post and make sure I don't leave out some words, but anyway...)

Yeah, I see what you mean. All good, from an understanding point of view, if nothing else.

I suspect my reaction comes down to almost not wanting to dilute the word propaganda, if that makes sense?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-10-10 10:56 am (UTC)
ext_37604: (Default)
From: [identity profile] glitzfrau.livejournal.com
That makes perfect sense!

(no subject)

Date: 2007-10-11 04:57 pm (UTC)
ailbhe: (Default)
From: [personal profile] ailbhe
Oh. My. Gods and little ichthysaurs.

Profile

radegund: (Default)
radegund

September 2013

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425 262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags