Gender equivalence
Dec. 8th, 2005 11:33 pmA stray thought fluttered past my prefrontal cortex just now, and I thought it worth recording.
I hear, on occasion, the truism that the sexism inherent in society is illustrated by the difference in connotation between gendered pairs of words - master/mistress, poet/poetess, bachelor/spinster and so on. (These pairs fascinate me, I confess - particularly the more debatable ones, such as tailor/dressmaker or chef/cook.)
It occurs to me that I've never heard of a male equivalent of the "Dear John letter" - you know, the one that a woman writes to her husband, out on whom she is walking Without a Word of Warning.
[Poll #629978]
The thing that strikes me, you see, is that the application of such a familiar, jokey tag to the notion of an "I'm leaving you" letter reduces it, circumscribes it, makes it less threatening. The "Dear John letter" is not written by a strong woman, striking out for the sunlit uplands: it's all slightly pathetic and drippy and embarrassing, and That's Women For You. You wouldn't take it seriously. Pre-emptive devoicing, as it were.
Or am I wildly off base, here?
And in conclusion:
[Poll #629979]
I hear, on occasion, the truism that the sexism inherent in society is illustrated by the difference in connotation between gendered pairs of words - master/mistress, poet/poetess, bachelor/spinster and so on. (These pairs fascinate me, I confess - particularly the more debatable ones, such as tailor/dressmaker or chef/cook.)
It occurs to me that I've never heard of a male equivalent of the "Dear John letter" - you know, the one that a woman writes to her husband, out on whom she is walking Without a Word of Warning.
[Poll #629978]
The thing that strikes me, you see, is that the application of such a familiar, jokey tag to the notion of an "I'm leaving you" letter reduces it, circumscribes it, makes it less threatening. The "Dear John letter" is not written by a strong woman, striking out for the sunlit uplands: it's all slightly pathetic and drippy and embarrassing, and That's Women For You. You wouldn't take it seriously. Pre-emptive devoicing, as it were.
Or am I wildly off base, here?
And in conclusion:
[Poll #629979]
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 03:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 09:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 10:16 am (UTC)I seem to remember a sit-com based around this whole concept which left the receiver(s) of such letters pretty much lost in the world.
If you see what I mean?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 11:20 am (UTC)Hmmm. I think part of my point about stereotypes and described/describer still stands, though, as "Dear John" came first. Must think about this some more.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 11:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 11:27 am (UTC)Also thanks a million: I now have the theme song for that very sitcom planted in my head. Lyrics and all. Argh! Why do I remember these things in such detail? Why?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 11:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 11:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 11:49 am (UTC)What are they calling it instead, do you know? "Bachelorette"? Or is it just "single person" for both?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 01:10 pm (UTC)I'm also wondering if we have 'Dear John' letters less because of the news factor in a woman leaving a man and more because most men just wouldn't leave a note? Or that women would prefer to avoid confrontation and just slip quietly away? But I suppose it may come down to all of the notions about such things being stereotypes in many ways.
Ok, there are other thoughts here as well. I'm thinking through my thoughts and images regarding couples splitting up in this way and it just seems hard to imagine a man leaving a note like that. Storming off, yes. Packing a bag while arguing with their wife, yes. Driving away, younger woman in the seat beside him etc. etc. More active forms of disengagement, not leaving notes.
So yes, stereotypes, but of both genders. Certainly in my own enlightened 21st Century way I would consider either gender leaving to be just as newsworthy, but I would expect them to leave in different ways.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 01:21 pm (UTC)So to me, the choice of name signifies that this is formulaic, and naturally, the default name is a male name. I see it as just being male=unmarked case rather than being anything particular about the way heterosexual relationships work, if that makes sense.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 01:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 01:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 02:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 02:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-09 09:09 pm (UTC)Ever.
Though *I* thought Dear John originated from women sending the letters to men away at war - "Dear John, I know you are frightfully heroic in the trenches, but I've met the most charming GI and I'm ever so frightfully heppy."
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-13 04:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-14 01:09 pm (UTC)